|
- |
- |
The
account following is not from Fulford's "Speculum Gregis". It is an
accompanying piece researched by David Ellison and included in his booklet "The
Rector and his Flock" published in 1980. |
- |
The
Croydon Farmers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A t
the time of the "Speculum Gregis", twelve tenant farmers supplied most
of the jobs in the parish of Croydon, but none farmed his own land. Mr J C Gape
(Lord of the Manor) leased his three Croydon farms to an agent (Withers), who
in turn subleased them; the Bursar of Downing managed the nine College farms himself,
carefully recording his decisions into the College minute books. Downing College
were seen to have been considerate landlords, if not astute businessmen. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
rentals on Gape's farms worked out at about 15 shillings per acre, higher then
than on some local farms as late as 1950. From the advertisements which his agent
Withers printed when he was trying to dispose of his lease, we can obtain many
details of the farm buildings. For the £418 which he paid Gape annually,
he obtained Manor Farm, and the two farms at Croydon Wilds. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manor Farm
was advertised as having "a pleasant two storey house with a porch".
There were then two parlours downstairs, with a kitchen, wash-house and dairy
behind; and four upstairs bedrooms. Outside there were three barns and another
'chaff and cutting barn', a cow house and a bullock house, two stables for ten
horses, a granary, cart shed, piggery and poultry houses. Two new cottages had
been erected for Pearman's two stock men, Blowes (page 82)
and Clark (page 81). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The farm itself
contained 350 acres, of which 65 were grassed down. After Abraham Pearman left,
Gape took the farm in hand himself, and sent a surveyor to examine the property
which was briefly occupied by a Mr Beale. Mowlson, the surveyor, noted that in
April 1844, there were 94 acres lying fallow and in tares, beans and peas; 128
acres of wheat, oats and barley; and another 44 acres of barley. Turnips have
not yet made an appearance in the rotation. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The farmhouse
itself seemed to have become a little shabby - Withers had been responsible for
repairs. Mowlson said it needed "painting, whitewashing and colouring";
the kitchen needed a new oven; an upstairs back bedroom also required painting
and Beale had asked for the pump to be moved out of the house into the yard. He
also wanted a new shed there, and Mowlson agreed to pull down some old cottages
which had become "noisesome". Gape agreed that the work should be done.
[Sources: Cambridgeshire Record Office L 71.51 Valuation by I S Mowlson, Particulars
of Sale 296/SP 16, and the Cambridge Chronicle 21 May 1842.] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the north
of the parish, the two farms at Croydon Wilds were similar in size; both concentrated
on their arable. James Law at East Farm had only 33 acres of its 176 under grass,
and William Wilkins a mere 20 out of 174 acres. Other sale advertisements in the
Cambridge Chronicle show what crops were grown. Miss White, when she gave up her
father's farm at Tadlow Road, was only keeping 70 acres under the plough; she
had 20 acres of wheat, 27 of barley, 16 of peas and beans and 7 of tares. But
at the auction in September 1843 she put in 101 Leicester and Down cross lambs
up for sale, with 21 shearling and 65 store ewes "very fresh"; and she
had 2 sows and 25 store pigs. Like many other small farmers the dairy herd she
kept was only that which could be milked by one person, very probably herself.
She had 5 cows in calf, 5 heifers, 5 weaning calves and a "well-bred Shorthorn
bull". Milk yields would not then have amounted to more than 300 gallons
a year, and most of the milk was used to produce butter and cheese. Cambridge
was too far off for daily milk deliveries, and the villagers could not afford
it - they made do with skim-milk or whey. The pigs would probably end up in the
London market, as would the mutton, probably through the hands of a sheep jobber
(the local sheep jobber was William Pierce of Orwell who owned a cottage in Croydon).
[Sources: The Cambridge Chronicle 21 May, 22 July and
2 September 1842 and 13 April 1844.] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If Cambridgeshire
had a success story it was in the breeding of the new Leicester and Down Cross
sheep. At Babraham, twenty miles away, Jonas Webb specialised in the breeding
of this animal which had almost entirely replaced 'the common Cambridgeshire'
which Vancouver had reported at the end of the previous century; the annual sales
at Babraham were well known throughout southern England, and just two miles away
at Wimpole Hall the Earl of Hardwicke's Home Farm was virtually a model for the
county - well equipped and beautifully stocked. The Leicester and Down Cross was
saleable a year earlier, though some of the fine quality of the fleece was lost,
oddly enough because of the improved feed. Sheep troughs and hurdles figure in
nearly all the farm sales, along with dairy and brewing utensils. [Sources:
Charles Vancouver "A General View of Agriculture in the County of Cambridgeshire,
with Observations on the Means of its Improvement" pub 1794 pp 82-93, and
the Wimpole Home Farm inventory is in the Hertfordshire Records Office ref D/ECd/F104]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samuel
George's farm was sold in 1844; for sale then were six "good working horses",
3 foals and a filly. Most farmers bred their own plough horses; some were well
heeled enough to have hunters, like Charles King, and the hounds met then, as
they do now, both at the Downing Arms in Croydon and the Hardwicke Arms
in Arrington. Also figuring in the items advertised were the carts and gigs, the
occasional chaise, a special lamb van and road waggons fitted with six-inch iron
shod rims, these paid less to go through the toll gates, since their broad wheels
broke up the road surface less. But mainly the carts were for dunging the fields.
Mr Haydon at Arrington, who went bankrupt in July 1842, had six.
[Sources: for Samuel George, the Cambridge Chronicle for 30 November 1844, for
Haydon the Cambridge Chronicles for 27 April and 14 September 1844.] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Haydon's at
Arrington is our last example. Several Croydon men walked the three miles thither
daily. He had had 150 acres under crops - 56 of wheat, 60 of barley, 15 of peas,
6 of tares and 10 of clover seed. Clover was a recent innovation. Some was dunged
for mowing as hay, and the rest generally fed to the sheep; a little was left
for seed. Haydon's bankruptcy was only one of many in the county; the Cambridge
Chronicle is full of sale notices, tenancy changes and even the curious notice
about the Croydon churchwarden, Chandler Merry, who took over Manor Farm. Just
before Fulford arrived there was this indication of the strain on the tenant farmers: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Chandler
Merry... attempted to put an end to this existence by cutting his throat with
a razor, and so far succeeded that his life is despaired of. The cause of this
melancholy event is, it is said, low nervous affection since the death of his
wife twelve months ago." [Source: Cambridge Chronicle
10 July 1841] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merry's
depression had certainly lifted by the time Fulford arrived, for his entry (page
62) in the Speculum Gregis" shows him to have remarried a London lady, "very
civil and friendly". But Fulford remarks pointedly of William Ellis (page
88), nephew of the Tadlow farmer whose threshing machine caused the riot, that
he was "engaged to be married, but waiting for better times". How were
the better times to come? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Throughout
the length and breadth of England there were bitter argument over corn prices.
They had been high in 1839: at 70s 8d a quarter, higher than they had been for
twenty years. But a series of good harvests lowered the price to 50s 10d by 1845.
Proponents of repeal of the Corn Laws maintained that abolishing the duty of imported
corn would increase the country's true prosperity. What would the repeal of the
Corn Laws do to country districts like Croydon? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nearly all
the Cambridgeshire farmers thought it would break them. The Earl of Hardwicke
at Wimpole Hall led local opposition to their repeal, and even resigned his government
appointment; Croydon was among many parishes whose tenant farmers organised petitions
against repeal. When the Anti-Corn Law League came to Cambridge as the
campaign stepped up and Cobden held meetings in the city, counter-demonstrations
were put on. One meeting of tenant farmers passed a resolution deploring "the
unnscrupulous counduct of the dangerous society calling itself the Anti-Corn Law
League" and attacking its "nefarious designs". [Sources:
Samuel Jones "On the Farming of Cambridgeshire", "Journal of the
Royal Agricultural Society" vol 7. 1846, pp35 et seq, "Cambridge Chronicle"
10 July 1841, "Cambridge Chronicle" 29 May and 5 June 1841 and "Cambridge
Chronicle" 10 February 1844.] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In fact the
best of Cambridgeshire farming methods were very good, and proved to be well able
to withstand the shock of repeal which came the year after Rev Fulford left Croydon.
As 'Improvement' had come late to the county, many lessons had been learned. Samuel
Jones claimed:"Few counties have improved more than Cambridgeshire has lately
done,... We see now the land farmed on the four course system - the best that
could be adopted. ...Large flocks of sheep (not barely kept in existence, as heretofore)
are fattened with corn and cake, thus enriching the land, and increasing its productive
powers". [Source: Jonas, op cit] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Downing College's
rent books show that they ploughed back nearly half their gross rentals on improvements.
Buildings were kept in good repair, trees planted in the village and a modest
income obtained from the sale of elm and ash poles. Game was preserved, and a
woodman employed. Tenants were reimbursed for draining the heavier lands near
the Cam: Mrs Casbourn received some £25 for drainage in Sweet Mead. When
a freak hailstorm caused widespread damage throughout the county on the 10 August
1843, Mr Ellis (page 88) and Mrs Casbourn (page 74) both received rebates of £100
and £30 respectively. [Source: Downing College
Rent Books 1840-1844, Downing College Proceedings, Vol B, 1812-1860]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It
must have been quite a storm - the "Chronicle" reported that "many
windows were broken by large hailstones, some of which weighed a quarter of a
pound. Pigeons in large quantities were killed and livestock hurled into ditches
as if by a hurricane." The Church Register in nearby Wimpole recorded "A
most dreadful storm passed over this parish and caused the most serious destruction
of property. It began about 4 o'clock p.m. and lasted several hours - the lightning
and hail were terrific, the former like sheets of fire filled the air and ran
along the ground, the latter as large as pigeon's eggs; some larger and others
large angular masses of ice.... The destruction of property was dreadful! All
the windows on the north side of the Mansion [i.e. Wimpole Hall] were broken,
all the hothouses, and every window facing the north in many of the cottages!...
The storm entered from the north sea and passed through the land in a SW direction,
spreading ruin in its progress - "the land before it was as the Garden of
Eden, behind it a barren and desolate wilderness". The corn over which it
passed was entirely threshed out, boughs and limbs torn off the trees, pigeons
and crows killed, many sheep struck by lightning, and what the hail and lightning
did not utterly destroy, the rain which fell in torrents finished. Such was the
violence of the rain and its continuance that a stream rolled down Arrington Hill
four or five feet deep, washed men off their feet, and carried away 30 or 40 feet
of the Park wall. But amidst all this affliction God was merciful; no human lives
were lost, and the destruction of property, although grievous, was partial."
[Source: "Cambridge Chronicle" 12 August
1843, Wimpole Parish Registers CRO P179/1/2.] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Would Downing
College's improvement work enable Croydon to keep up with the threatened catastrophe?
Would the growing population outstrip the food grown? These were the fears of
the farmers; and Jonas, though an optimist, had some reservations about this area
of the county: "As you ascend the range of hills, you find the soil of a
thin staple and very poor, resting on a tough retentive tenacious clayey subsoil,
of very little depth, which has not yet been well-farmed. From Wimpole to Hatley
I found a large tract of country very badly cultivated, not only covered with
thistles, couch grass etc, but sadly wanting that first and great improvement
on heavy clays, viz, thorough draining. [Source: Jonas,
ibid] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How
to make the land pay best? One of the farmers had a solution noted by the Rector
just a little different from the others. "Old Larkins" (William Larkins
- page 61) "rents some land and is a cattle jobber and drover". He rented
from Downing College, paid a rental of £120 and used the land merely as
a holding ground for the herds of Scots and Yorkshire cattle brought south by
the drovers, first to the Huntingdon market, and then on to the London markets.
Some were sold on quickly, others kept to finish as stores and the few unfit to
travel further were butchered locally. It was a business which would thrive only
until the railway network linked north and south. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Farmers played
another role in the community - that of managers of the parish in local affairs
under the chairmanship of the Rector. They were not only employers, but administered
the parish roads, maintained law and order, and until 1834 they had tried to tackle
the problems of the aged, the sick and the poor. To do this, they elected annually
- if 'elected' is the right word among such a small group - a Surveyor of the
Roads, an Overseer of the Poor; and the Constable was as often as not one of their
employees, perhaps a foreman on one of their farms. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Work
in Progress) |
- |
© Copyright Steve Odell and the WimpolePast website 2002-2021. | |
- Contact the Website here. - All information on this web site is supplied in good faith. - No responsibility can be taken for errors or omissions. - This site does not use cookies. |
All information on this web site is supplied in good faith. No responsibility can be taken for errors or omissions. This site does not use cookies. |